The Brookbush Institute (BOC AP# P10038) is approved by the Board of Certification, Inc. to provide continuing education to Athletic Trainers (ATs). This program is eligible for a maximum of {{credits}} hours/ Category A CEUs. ATs should claim only those hours actually spent in the educational program.

Board Of Certification

Providers of Approved Continuing Education

This activity is provided by the Texas Board of Physical Therapy Examiners Accredited Provider 2309052TX and meets continuing competence requirements for physical therapist and physical therapist assistant licensure renewal in Texas.

Texas Physical Therapy Association

New York Physical Therapist just a disclaimer The Brookbush Institute (B2C Fitness) is recognized by the New York State Education Department's State Board for Physical Therapy as an approved provider of physical therapy and physical therapist assistant continuing education.

New York State Education Department's State Board for Physical Therapy

Approved for {{credits}} CEUs by CPTA #CPTAAP-36

California Physical Therapy Association

Approved by CATA and 1 course contact hour = 0.4 CATA CEUs

Canadian Athletic Therapists Association

Special Tests: Hip Joint Audio

Special tests for the hip joint. The FABER (Patrick's) Test, FADDIR Test, Impingement Provocation Test, Trendelenburg Sign, Single Leg Stance Test, and Sign of the Buttock. The reliability, specificity, sensitivity, validity, safety, and screening for the hip joint, hip pain, hip pathology, sacroiliac joint pain (SIJ pain), femoral acetabular impingement, labrum (labral) tear, gluteus medius weakness (a potential sign of hip pathology, and/or gluteal tendinopathy), and intra-articular pathology (tumor, abscess, necrosis, or more benign osteochondritis, loose-body pathologies, edema of the hip).

Special Tests: Hip Joint

Access to all courses with monthly membership

Brookbush Institute

I have almost completed my CPT certification and am half-way through the Human Movement certification to inform my massage practice. The different modalities of reading, watching audiovisual materials, and attending live or recorded webinars have been important to my learning style and for review.

Brookbush Institute has the most detailed, specific and effective tools for online learning for movement and/or bodywork professionals. I love the combination of the videos as well as the text available online.

I recently completed the CPT course. It was demanding yet practical. I would highly recommend it for anyone wanting an education about human movement.

I have my personal trainer certificate through here and am almost finished my human movement specialist certification. Overall, the education that Brookbush has packaged together for clinicians and trainers is invaluable. I am a physio assistant so coming from more of a rehab background I appreciate that this education has been beneficial both as a trainer and in a rehab setting. I love that I have been able to do all learning at my own pace and able to work around my schedule. Thank you for setting up this platform! Highly recommend :)

I have been a massage therapist for 10 yrs and I feel like all the “pieces” I’ve learned throughout the yrs have been put into place and can see the full picture. I am also a member to tons of great content since I love to learn! I plan to get my CPT through them as well.

I have been following Brent Brookbush for nearly a decade- back when I was a personal Trainer and now as a Physical Therapist. BBI is an incredible resource for any movement nerds and corrective exercise specialists! The information is thorough with multiple real world applications. I am looking forward to an in-person Manual Therapist course the second they do one a little bit closer to Virginia ;)

I have taken both the Human Movement Specialist and Certified Personal Trainer certificate programs and have found the value in understanding the how and ways the body moves and functions and from evidence, non-biased, outcome, conceptual, theoretical, and practical approach to helping my clients/patients look better, feel better, and move better.

Over the last years I've returned time and again to Brookbush Institute for stellar coursework as I've worked toward a Human Movement Specialist certification. (I'm currently ACE CPT, and in training with Anatomy Trains for Structural Integration Manual Therapy.) Every Brookbush Institute module is fantastic and each one includes detailed informational videos, written descriptions of how to-do, and, more importantly, why to-do!

I am a 70 yr old chiropractor and no other healthcare provider was able to come up with an exercise protocol particular to my structural and balances and muscle deficits and keep me in the game. And as for continuing education on human skeletal movement, the website is phenomenal full of great exercises for particular mechanical dysfunction.

The H.M.S. is the most valuable certificate I have earned and was a fraction of the the cost of my others. Define the best bang for your buck!

Brookbush is the most efficient Personal Training Certification I have ever come across. All the lessons are well thought out and very straight to the point.

I am getting my Master's degree in Kinesiology, and I would like to say that I have benefited greatly from the rich, comprehensive, well-documented scientific content of Brookbush Institute that links theory to practical applications. Proudly I've got my CPT certificate, and I am on my way to get my HMS certificate.

Having courses count towards different certifications makes it so users can transition seamlessly from one certification to another. In my case, going from earning the BI CPT to earning the BI HMS was an easy decision and I am proud to have earned both certifications. I have also had the pleasure of going to a Live HMS workshop that was well taught by Instructor Boettcher and that was excellent to see how the methods and techniques are implemented.



I have been a member of BBI for years and every course I have taken has been incredibly informative. I learn more from these courses than I do at local CEU courses for my PTA license. I also earned my CPT and HMS certifications through the platform. It was so convenient and the content was top notch! Forever member.

We learn principles in academia, we learn cool new modalities via whatever specialty certification, but BBI really concentrates on the nuances of passive treatment and they do a fantastic job. The format in which BBI instructs soft tissue specialists (DPTs, Chiros, ATs) like myself feels like almost like an apprenticeship. You get a thoroughly detailed explanation of the “why’s”, and a visual comprehension of how to apply. Personally, I believe application is where the good and the great are distinguished.

Brookbush has been incredibly helpful since I was in massage school and now as I’m in my career! I run my own practice and it gives me the resources I need to not only improve what I already know, but also help me navigate better, more efficient ways of treatment.

Totally loving the convenience and affordability of this program with my crazy lifestyle! I feel like I am getting a quality education without a massive cost! My favorite part is the videos I can watch in the courses. I learn so much better that way. Once I really spent more time on the site, I figured out how to maneuver around a lot better! I enjoy the sense of humor, as well as the easy explanation, and short tests. And if I am really tired, I can have the computer read me the lessons. 😁

Challenging concepts are explained in very understandable terms without dumbing down the material, and I find this program to be superior in quality to other personal training programs.

Home

Courses

Hip Pathology Tests (Hip impingement, Osteoarthritis, and Labral Tears)
 

Trendelenburg Sign & Single Leg Stance Test

Hip osteoarthritis, hip impingement, and hip labral tears are among the most often diagnosed hip pathologies; however, more serious conditions do occur like muscle loss and the "sign of the buttock" (implication of intra-articular bleeding, infection, neoplasm, etc.). The hip pathology tests (hip impingement, osteoarthritis, and labral tear tests) are sensitive, but lack specificity, implying their utility to refine intervention selection is likely poor. The 

 may be observed during gait, but the tests themselves lack sensitivity. Further, hip muscle weakness may result from dysfunction of the lumbar spine, sacroiliac joint, or the hip joint; again implying these tests have poor specificity and limited utility in practice. The 

 is an important clinical test, implying "red flag" conditions that should result in referral to emergency care.

An effort was made to choose the best group of special tests for the hip, in large part by eliminating special tests with little or no clinical utility. A research study that demonstrated the utility of a test-item cluster for hip pathology could not be located. The majority of special tests for the hip are not sensitive or specific enough to have any clinical usefulness. Additionally, many special tests for the hip are simply variations of one another. For example, the 

 covered in this course is similar to the Maximal Flexion Internal Rotation (MFIR) Test, the Flexion Internal Rotation test, The Flexion Adduction Axial Compression Test, and the Flexion Adduction Internal Rotation (FAIR) test. An effort was made to select the test variation that research has demonstrated as most accurate, and/or was most well supported by the current body of research.

The clinical issue with the "Hip Pathology Special Tests," including those selected for this course, is an inability to differentiate between hip impingement, labrum pathology, osteoarthritis, and other related diagnoses. That is, some studies have noted hip special tests have high specificity, but that is only when a positive test is defined as "hip pathology". This implies that hip special tests may be good screens, but they are not helpful for differential diagnosis, and/or refining intervention selection.

 may aid in identifying significant hip abductor weakness during functional tasks; however, their sensitivity is so poor that other options must be considered during clinical evaluation (e.g. 

). Further, hip muscle weakness may result from dysfunction of the lumbar spine, sacroiliac joint, or hip joint.

 is important for identifying serious conditions that should be addressed with immediate emergency care. For example, a positive test may imply hip osteomyelitis, sepsis, neoplasm, femoral head fracture, etc. It is unlikely these conditions would be encountered frequently by sports medicine professionals; however, the severity of the issues are significant enough to imply knowledge of this "red flag" condition is recommended.

 recommends that clinical movement professionals (physical therapists, physical therapy assistants, chiropractors, occupational therapists, athletic trainers, etc.) should be aware of these tests. Physical rehabilitation (e.g. manual therapy, certain modalities, and corrective exercise) is often the safest and most effective option for treating hip impingement, labrum pathology, osteoarthritis, and/or hip muscle weakness. In practice, the abductor weakness tests likely only have utility if noted during functional movement patterns (e.g. walking into the clinic), but the tests themselves should not be included in evaluation. The hip pathology special tests likely have utility as pre-post intervention assessments, but only if the test matches the patient's symptoms (concordant sign), and likely have no utility for differential diagnosis or refining intervention selection. Last, the 

 is a "good test", but likely best used when the subjective examination indicates potentially serious issues that may require emergency care.

For an introduction to Special Tests including definitions of specific terminology, what special tests measure, accuracy (specificity, sensitivity, reliability, etc.), how we chose the tests in each special test course lessons, and best practice recommendations:

Courses covering Special Tests for the Lumbo Pelvic Hip Complex

Special Tests: Lower Body Neurodynamic Tests

Course Description: Special Tests: Hip Joint

For an introduction to Special Tests including definitions of specific terminology, what special tests measure, how we chose the tests in these lessons, and best use, check out:

 is important for identifying serious conditions that should be addressed with immediate emergency care. For example, a positive test may imply hip osteomyelitis, sepsis, neoplasm, femoral head fracture, etc. It is unlikely these conditions are encountered frequently by sports medicine professionals; however, the severity of the issues are significant enough to imply knowledge of this "red flag" condition is recommended.

 recommends that clinical movement professionals (physical therapists, physical therapy assistants, chiropractors, occupational therapists, athletic trainers, etc.) should be aware of these tests. Physical rehabilitation (e.g. manual therapy, certain modalities, and corrective exercise) is often the safest and most effective option for treating hip impingement, labrum pathology, osteoarthritis, and/or hip muscle weakness. In practice, the abductor weakness tests likely only have utility if noted during functional movement patterns (e.g. walking into the clinic), and the tests themselves should not be included in evaluation. The hip pathology special tests likely have utility as pre-post intervention assessments, but only if the test matches the patient's symptoms (concordant sign), and likely have no utility for differential diagnosis or refining intervention selection. Last, the 

Introduction

FABER test

FABER (Patrick's) Test

FADDIR (Femoral Acetabular Impingement) Test

Cadaver Dissection of Hip Joint with Soft Tissue Removed and Bony Landmarks Labeled

Impingement Provocation Test

Hip Pathology Tests (Hip impingement, Osteoarthritis, and Labral Tears)

Trendelenburg Sign 

Trendelenburg Test and Single-Leg Stance Test

Pathological Abductor Weakness

Sign of the Buttock

Red Flag

Cook, C., & Hegedus, E. J. (2008). Orthopedic physical examination tests: an evidence-based approach.

Dutton's Orthopaedic examination, evaluation, and intervention

Cliborne, A. V., Wainner, R. S., Rhon, D. I., Judd, C. D., Fee, T. T., Matekel, R. L., & Whitman, J. M. (2004). Clinical hip tests and a functional squat test in patients with knee osteoarthritis: reliability, prevalence of positive test findings, and short-term response to hip mobilization. 

Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy

Clohisy, J. C., Knaus, E. R., Hunt, D. M., Lesher, J. M., Harris-Hayes, M., & Prather, H. (2009). Clinical presentation of patients with symptomatic anterior hip impingement. 

Clinical orthopaedics and related research

Martin, R. L., & Sekiya, J. K. (2008). The interrater reliability of 4 clinical tests used to assess individuals with musculoskeletal hip pain. 

journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy

Mitchell, B., McCrory, P., Brukner, P., O'donnell, J., Colson, E., & Howells, R. (2003). Hip joint pathology: clinical presentation and correlation between magnetic resonance arthrography, ultrasound, and arthroscopic findings in 25 consecutive cases. 

Philippon, M. J., Maxwell, R. B., Johnston, T. L., Schenker, M., & Briggs, K. K. (2007). Clinical presentation of femoroacetabular impingement. 

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Ross, M. D., Nordeen, M. H., & Barido, M. (2003). Test-retest reliability of Patrick's hip range of motion test in healthy college-aged men. 

Journal of strength and conditioning research

Theiler, R., Stucki, G., Schütz, R., Hofer, H., Seifert, B., Tyndall, A., & Michel, B. A. (1996). Parametric and non-parametric measures in the assessment of knee and hip osteoarthritis: interobserver reliability and correlation with radiology. 

Troelsen, A., Mechlenburg, I., Gelineck, J., Bolvig, L., Jacobsen, S., & Søballe, K. (2009). What is the role of clinical tests and ultrasound in acetabular labral tear diagnostics?. 

Sutlive, T. G., Lopez, H. P., Schnitker, D. E., Yawn, S. E., Halle, R. J., Mansfield, L. T., … & Childs, J. D. (2008). Development of a clinical prediction rule for diagnosing hip osteoarthritis in individuals with unilateral hip pain. 

Slipman, C. W., Sterenfeld, E. B., Chou, L. H., Herzog, R., & Vresilovic, E. (1998). The predictive value of provocative sacroiliac joint stress maneuvers in the diagnosis of sacroiliac joint syndrome. 

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation

Dreyfuss, P., Michaelsen, M., Pauza, K., McLarty, J., & Bogduk, N. (1996). The value of medical history and physical examination in diagnosing sacroiliac joint pain. 

Van Deursen, L. L. J. M., Patijn, J., Ockhuysen, A. L., & Vortman, B. J. (1990). The value of some clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint. 

Broadhurst, N. A., & Bond, M. J. (1998). Pain provocation tests for the assessment of sacroiliac joint dysfunction. 

Albert, H., Godskesen, M., & Westergaard, J. (2000). Evaluation of clinical tests used in classification procedures in pregnancy-related pelvic joint pain. 

Hansen, A., Jensen, D. V., Larsen, E. C., Wilken-Jensen, C., Kaae, B. E., Frølich, S., … & Hansen, T. M. (2005). Postpartum pelvic pain-the'pelvic joint syndrome': a follow-up study with special reference to diagnostic methods. 

Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica

Röst, C. C., Jacqueline, J., Kaiser, A., Verhagen, A. P., & Koes, B. W. (2004). Pelvic pain during pregnancy: a descriptive study of signs and symptoms of 870 patients in primary care. 

Ozgocmen, S., Bozgeyik, Z., Kalcik, M., & Yildirim, A. (2008). The value of sacroiliac pain provocation tests in early active sacroiliitis. 

Arab, A. M., Abdollahi, I., Joghataei, M. T., Golafshani, Z., & Kazemnejad, A. (2009). Inter-and intra-examiner reliability of single and composites of selected motion palpation and pain provocation tests for sacroiliac joint. 

Beaulé, P. E., Zaragoza, E., Motamedi, K., Copelan, N., & Dorey, F. J. (2005). Three‐dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. 

Beck, M., Leunig, M., Parvizi, J., Boutier, V., Wyss, D., & Ganz, R. (2004). Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: part II. Midterm results of surgical treatment. 

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Burnett, R. S. J., Dellarocca, G. J., Prather, H., Curry, M., & Maloney, W. J. (2008, March). Clinical Presentation of Patients with Tears of the Acetabular Labrum. In 

 (Vol. 90, No. SUPP_I, pp. 152-152). The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Ito, K., Leunig, M., & Ganz, R. (2004). Histopathologic features of the acetabular labrum in femoroacetabular impingement. 

Kang, L., Belcher, D., & Hulstyn, M. J. (2005). Stress fractures of the femoral shaft in women’s college lacrosse: a report of seven cases and a review of the literature. 

Kassarjian, A., Yoon, L. S., Belzile, E., Connolly, S. A., Millis, M. B., & Palmer, W. E. (2005). Triad of MR arthrographic findings in patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. 

Keeney, J. A., Peelle, M. W., Jackson, J., Rubin, D., Maloney, W. J., & Clohisy, J. C. (2004). Magnetic resonance arthrography versus arthroscopy in the evaluation of articular hip pathology. 

Klaue, K., Durnin, C. W., & Ganz, R. (1991). The acetabular rim syndrome. A clinical presentation of dysplasia of the hip. 

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume

Leunig, M., Werlen, S., Ungersböck, A., Ito, K., & Ganz, R. (1997). Evaluation of the acetabular labrum by MR arthrography. 

Sink, E. L., Gralla, J., Ryba, A., & Dayton, M. (2008). Clinical presentation of femoroacetabular impingement in adolescents. 

Martin, H. D., Kelly, B. T., Leunig, M., Philippon, M. J., Clohisy, J. C., Martin, R. L., … & Safran, M. R. (2010). The pattern and technique in the clinical evaluation of the adult hip: the common physical examination tests of hip specialists. 

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery

Reiman, M. P., Goode, A. P., Cook, C. E., Hölmich, P., & Thorborg, K. (2015). Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for the diagnosis of hip femoroacetabular impingement/labral tear: a systematic review with meta-analysis. 

Reiman, M. P., Goode, A. P., Hegedus, E. J., Cook, C. E., & Wright, A. A. (2013). Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests of the hip: a systematic review with meta-analysis. 

Trendelenberg & Single-leg Stance Held for 30 Seconds (1-3, 24, 28)

Lequesne, M., Mathieu, P., Vuillemin‐Bodaghi, V., Bard, H., & Djian, P. (2008). Gluteal tendinopathy in refractory greater trochanter pain syndrome: diagnostic value of two clinical tests. 

Bird, P. A., Oakley, S. P., Shnier, R., & Kirkham, B. W. (2001). Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging and physical examination findings in patients with greater trochanteric pain syndrome. 

Arthritis & Rheumatism: Official Journal of the American College of Rheumatology

Greenwood, M. J., Erhard, R. E., & Jones, D. L. (1998). Differential diagnosis of the hip vs. lumbar spine: five case reports. 

Bibliography

Questions, comments, and criticisms are welcomed and encouraged

Special Tests: Hip Joint

Related Courses:

Course Description: Special Tests: Hip Joint

Introduction

Hip Pathology Tests (Hip impingement, Osteoarthritis, and Labral Tears)
3 Sub Sections

Pathological Abductor Weakness
1 Sub Section

Red Flag
1 Sub Section

Bibliography

Related Courses:

Comments

Guest

Special Tests: Hip Joint

Related Courses:

Course Description: Special Tests: Hip Joint

Introduction

Hip Pathology Tests (Hip impingement, Osteoarthritis, and Labral Tears)3 Sub Sections

Pathological Abductor Weakness1 Sub Section

Red Flag1 Sub Section

Bibliography

Related Courses:

Comments

Guest

Hip Pathology Tests (Hip impingement, Osteoarthritis, and Labral Tears)
3 Sub Sections

Pathological Abductor Weakness
1 Sub Section

Red Flag
1 Sub Section