Levels Of Evidence
Levels of Evidence - Relative to evidence-based practice, levels of evidence are an attempt to describe the strength of the results measured in a clinical trial or research study. Note: levels of evidence do not supersede the critical evaluation of an experienced professional, and should be viewed as guidelines - a meta-analysis may be poorly constructed (Level IA), and a comparative study (Level III) may employ new technologies and a strong methodology.
The Levels of Evidence used by the Brookbush Institute, as described by Shekelle et al.(1):
- IA - Evidence from meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- IB - Evidence from at least one randomized controlled trial
- IIA - Evidence from at least one controlled study without randomization
- IIB - Evidence from at least one other type of quasi-experimental study
- III - Evidence from non-experimental descriptive studies, such as comparative studies, correlation studies, and case-control studies
- IV - Evidence from expert committee reports or opinions or clinical experience of respected authorities, or both
- Shekelle, P. G., Woolf, S. H., Eccles, M., & Grimshaw, J. (1999). Developing clinical guidelines. Western Journal of Medicine, 170(6), 348.
Related Terms
- Evidence-based practice
- Meta-analysis
- Randomized controlled trial
- Quasi-experimental study
- Descriptive study
- Expert committee report
- Clinical guidelines
Synonyms
- level of evidence
- evidence level
- evidence levels