Manual Muscle Testing (MMT): Upper Body

Why Assessment?

All fitness, performance, and rehabilitation programs should start with an assessment. The goal of assessment is to refine technique selection, with the intent of improving client and patient outcomes. This course describes potential additions to a comprehensive movement assessment that are most commonly referred to as "manual muscle testing" (a.k.a. MMT, MMTs, muscle testing, strength testing, muscle strength testing, strength assessment, strength measures, manual resistance, etc.). The tests included in this course are intended for muscles prone to inhibition (e.g. underactive, hypotonic, phasic, exhibiting muscle weakness, etc.).

When to Use Manual Muscle Tests:

It is important that the intent of manual muscle tests, the length of a muscle group, the activity of a muscle group, and the testing position are considered prior to the their application. Any muscle that has adopted a compensatory change in length or activity (altered length/tension relationship) may test "weak", "with compensation", or "with pain". For example, if an individual presents with Arms Fall during an Overhead Squat Assessment , and goniometry confirms a loss of shoulder flexion extensibility, it is likely that manual resistance of shoulder extension (from 180 degrees of shoulder flexion) would result in a finding of "weakness" or "with compensation". If the intention of manual muscle testing is to address muscles assessed as "weak" or "with compensation" with strengthening exercises, then we might assume that we should strengthen the latissimus dorsi to address this weakness. But, this logic is flawed. Unfortunately, strengthening the latissimus dorsi may increase activity, further decrease shoulder flexion mobility (by contributing additional shortening), and may result in poor carry-over of results from session to session; even if strengthening the latissimus dorsi results in initial improvements in strength. Although counter-intuitive based on manual muscle testing alone, we may improve shoulder extension strength more by optimizing length-tension relationships with release and lengthening techniques for the latissimus dorsi . For these reasons, manual muscle tests are likely best applied to muscles that are implicated as inhibited by a dynamic movement assessment (e.g. the Overhead Squat Assessment ), and performed as pre/post tests to confirm the effectiveness of selected activation, strengthening, stability, integration, and/or conditioning techniques.

The Brookbush Institute recommends that these assessments are added to the repertoire of all sports medicine professionals (personal trainers, fitness instructors, physical therapists, massage therapists, chiropractors, occupational therapists, athletic trainers, etc.).

Additional Courses:

For a complete introduction to manual muscle testing (for an active population) including definitions of specific terminology, "why?" manual muscle testing, basic procedures, comparing traditional versus Brookbush Institute recommended scoring, amount of external resistance, what muscles should be tested, length/tension relationships, defining a “good assessment,” and best use check out:

• Manual Muscle Testing: Introduction

For Upper Body Manual Muscle Tests

• Manual Muscle Testing (MMT): Lower Body

Manual Muscle Tests Covered in this Course:

• Deep Cervical Flexors
• Shoulder External Rotators
• Lower Trapezius
• Serratus Anterior

Printable PDF of the Movement Assessment Template:

• Movement Assessment Template

Pre-approved credits for:

• Integrated Manual Therapist (IMT) Certification

Pre-approved for Continuing Education Credits for:

• Athletic Trainers
• Chiropractors
• Group Exercise Instructors
• Massage Therapists
• Occupational Therapists
• Personal Trainers
• Physical Therapists
• Physical Therapy Assistants

This Course Includes:

• AI Tutor
• Text and Illustrations
• Audio Voice-over
• Technique Videos
• Practice Exam
• Pre-approved Final Exam

1. Florence Peterson Kendall, Elizabeth Kendall McCreary, Patricia Geise Provance, Mary McIntyre Rodgers, William Anthony Romani, Muscles: Testing and Function with Posture and Pain: Fifth Edition © 2005 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2. Helen J. Hislop, Dale Avers, Marybeth Brown. Daniels and Worthingham's Muscle Testing: Techniques of Manual Examination and Performance Testing: 9th Edition. © 2014 Elsevier: Saunders
3. Dr. Mike Clark & Scott Lucette, “NASM Essentials of Corrective Exercise Training” © 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
4. Phillip Page, Clare Frank, Robert Lardner, Assessment and Treatment of Muscle Imbalance: The Janda Approach © 2010 Benchmark Physical Therapy, Inc., Clare C. Frank, and Robert Lardner
5. Carolyn Richardson, Paul Hodges, Julie Hides. Therapeutic Exercise for Lumbo Pelvic Stabilization – A Motor Control Approach for the Treatment and Prevention of Low Back Pain: 2nd Edition © 2004 Elsevier Limited
6. Shirley A Sahrmann, Diagnoses and Treatment of Movement Impairment Syndromes, © 2002 Mosby Inc.
7. Celik D, Dirican A, Baltaci G. (2012). Intrarater reliability of assessing strength of the shoulder and scapular muscles. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. Technical Notes 3:1-5.
8. Brookham RL, McLean L, Dickerson CR. (2010). Construct validity of muscle force tests of the rotator cuff muscles: an electromyographic investigation. Physical Therapy. 90(4): 572-580.
9. Olson LE, Millar AL, Dunker J, Hicks J, et al. (2006). Reliability of a clinical test for deep cervical flexor endurance. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 29(2): 134-138.
10. Dimitriadis Z, Kapreli E, Strimpakos N, Oldham J. (2015). Reliability of the chin tuck neck flexion test for assessing endurance of short neck flexors in healthy individuals. Physiother Theory Pract. 31(4): 299-302. (Only could access abstract)
11. Schwarts S, Cohen ME, Herbison GJ, Shah A. Relationship between two measures of upper extremity strength: manual muscle test compared to hand-held myometry. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73(11):1063-8
12. Wadsworth CT, Krishnan R, Sear M, Harrold J, Nielsen DH. Intratester reliability of manual muscle testing and hand-held dynametric muscle testing. Phys. Ther. 1987;67:1342-1347
13. Frese F, Brown M, Norton BJ. Clinical reliability of manual muscle testing: middle trapezius and gluteus medius muscles. Phys Ther. 1987;67:1072-1076
14. Beasley WC. Quantitative muscle testing: Principles and application to research and clinical services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1961;42:398-425
15. Wintz M. Variations in current manual muscle testing. Phys Ther Rev. 1959; 39:166-475
16. Cuthbert SCJ, Goodheart GJ. On the reliability and validity of manual muscle testing: a literature review. Chiropr Osteopat. 2007; 15;4.
17. Bohannon RW. Manual muscle testing: does it meet the standards of an adequate screening test? Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:662-667
18. Mulroy SJ, Lassen KD, Chamgers SH, Perry J. The ability of male and female clinicians to effectively test knee extension strength using manual muscle testing. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997;26:192-199
19. Edwards RHT, McConnell M. Hand-held dynamometer for evaluating voluntary muscle function. Lancet. 1971;9:757-758
20. Marino M, Nicholas JA, Gleim GW, et al. The efficacy of manual assessment of muscle strength using a new device. Am J Sports Med. 1982;10:360-364
21. Bohannon RW. Hand-held dynamometry: factos influencing reliability and validity. Clin Rehabil. 1998;11:263-264
22. Wilkholm JB, Bohannon RW. Hand-held dynamometry measurements: tester strength makes a difference J Ortho Sports Phys Ther. 1991;12:191-198