Abstract
- Title: Acute Variables: Exercise Range of Motion (ROM) - Strength, Hypertrophy, Power, and Performance Outcomes
- Background: Exercise range of motion (ROM) is a modifiable training variable influencing strength, hypertrophy, power, and performance. This course provides a systematic review of comparative research on the effects of partial versus full ROM across exercises and populations, with practical implications for resistance training, rehabilitation, and athletic performance.
- Objective: To evaluate how different ROM strategies (full, partial, shortened partials, lengthened partials, varied ROM) affect training outcomes, including force production, hypertrophy, EMG activity, torque, power, and ROM-specific strength.
- Eligibility Criteria: Peer-reviewed and published studies comparing exercise outcomes between full and partial ROM protocols across a range of exercises (e.g., squats, biceps curls, knee extensions, bench press).
- Information Sources: All available comparative studies matching the criteria that could be located at the time of publication.
- Risk of Bias: Protocols varied widely in exercise selection, participant experience level, and outcome measures. Equipment and task-specific designs (e.g., isokinetic concentric-only tasks) may limit generalizability.
- Results: Partial ROM exercise allows for heavier loading and may improve ROM-specific strength. However, full ROM training is more likely to increase strength across a greater range, produce greater work (force × distance), and enhance performance in both full and partial ROM strength assessments. Hypertrophy outcomes are generally similar across ROMs, though multiple studies show a small advantage for full ROM. EMG activity appears sensitive to both ROM and load, with mixed trends across muscles. Some muscles respond more to ROM (e.g., rectus femoris), others more to load (e.g., soleus). Power results are inconsistent across studies, but may benefit from a combination of ROM strategies. Notably, lengthened partials do not appear superior to full ROM for hypertrophy. Movement impairments (especially limited dorsiflexion, hip internal rotation, or muscle activation asymmetries) strongly correlate with reduced ROM during squats and other compound lifts.
- Limitations: Short intervention periods, small sample sizes, varied exercise selection, inconsistent load matching, and limited data on trained individuals all contribute to reducing the certainty of conclusions. No studies used standardized movement screens or corrective strategies.
- Conclusions: Both full and partial ROM exercises are effective. However, full ROM likely offers advantages for developing strength across a wider range and slightly better hypertrophy. Partial ROM strategies can be used to increase load, overcome sticking points, avoid painful ROMs, or match equipment constraints. A combined approach may yield optimal results. The Brookbush Institute recommends using the largest ROM that can be performed with good form and without pain, while considering strategic use of partial ROM for advanced programming.
- Registration: Not registered.
- Keywords: exercise range of motion; partial ROM; full ROM; resistance training; strength; hypertrophy; torque; EMG; lengthened partials
Introduction
Accurate range of motion (ROM) recommendations for evidence-based exercise programming.
- This course explores how variations in exercise range of motion (ROM) influence strength, hypertrophy, EMG activity, work output, power, and movement quality. From squats and knee extensions to biceps curls and bench press, you’ll examine the research on full ROM, partial ROM, and lengthened partial strategies to make data-driven programming decisions for clients, patients, and athletes.
Key Topics Covered
- Force, Work & Velocity: Learn why full ROM increases total work (via increased displacement) and peak velocity, while partial ROM allows for heavier loads and potentially greater force output.
- Strength and Power Outcomes: Explore ROM-specific strength adaptations and why full ROM squats and presses may lead to strength gains across a broader range.
- Hypertrophy Research: Comparing full vs. partial ROM and the effects on muscle size, including a critical review of the "Lengthened Partials" trend.
- Exercise-Specific ROM Findings: Deep dive into ROM research for squats, knee extensions, bench press, biceps curls, back extensions, and more.
- EMG Activity & Muscle-Specific Effects: Understand how muscle recruitment patterns differ between ROM conditions and how this impacts programming choices.
- Corrective Strategy Integration: Consider movement limitations (e.g., loss of dorsiflexion or hip internal rotation) that reduce ROM, and discover strategies to improve ROM with corrective exercises.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Is a full ROM better for strength?
- Probably, especially if you want strength across a full ROM; however, a partial ROM may be better for ROM-specific strength and heavier overloads.
Is full ROM better for hypertrophy?
- Most studies show similar hypertrophy; however, a few show that full ROM may be slightly more effective.
Are lengthened partials better than full ROM?
- No. Lengthened partials outperform shortened partials, but not full ROM or varied ROM strategies.
Why do some people use partial reps?
- To overload, isolate sticking points, or avoid painful ranges. These can be useful when strategically programmed.
Should I train with both full and partial ROM?
- In many cases, yes. Combining both can improve strength, power, and neuromuscular coordination.
What limits ROM the most?
- Often mobility restrictions, especially ankle dorsiflexion, hip IR, or joint capsule tightness. Address with corrective strategies.
Pre-approved Credits for:
Pre-approved for Continuing Education Credits for:
This course includes:
- AI Tutor
- Course Summary Webinar
- Study Guide
- Text and Illustrations
- Audio Voice-over
- Research Review
- Sample Routine
- Practice Exam
- Pre-approved 3 Credit Final Exam