

Complex training pairs strength and power exercises within the same session to improve performance outcomes such as maximal strength, jump performance, sprint ability, agility, and sport-specific power.
Test Critical Content
Coach Recommended Content
Mark As Complete
Background: Complex training integrates strength and power exercises within the same session to improve force production and high-velocity performance. Although commonly used to enhance strength, jumping, sprinting, agility, and sport-specific power, optimal exercise sequencing and programming variables remain debated.
Objective: To summarize evidence comparing complex training with strength-only, power-only, daily undulating, and block-periodized programs, and to develop practical recommendations for exercise order, volume, frequency, intensity, and rest intervals.
Methods: This evidence-based review summarized peer-reviewed studies of single-session and multi-week complex or contrast training protocols involving youth, adolescent, and adult athletes. Outcomes included maximal strength, jump performance, sprint performance, agility, change-of-direction performance, rate of force development, power output, and sport-specific performance.
Results: Multi-week complex training programs may improve maximal lower-body strength, jump performance, agility, and sport-specific power more than no additional training or general sport training alone. Comparisons with strength-only and power-only programs suggest that outcomes depend largely on training specificity; strength-focused programs may better emphasize maximal force, whereas plyometric or power-focused programs may better emphasize explosive movement. Complex training may be most useful when multiple performance qualities are targeted together. Comparisons with daily undulating and block-periodized programs suggest broadly similar outcomes across many measures, although complex training may improve more individual outcome measures in some studies. Acute-variable comparisons suggest that 1 and 2 sessions per week may produce similar improvements, and that insufficient rest may reduce the performance of subsequent power exercises.
Conclusions: Complex training is an evidence-supported strategy for improving strength and power outcomes in intermediate and advanced athletes. The Brookbush Institute recommends circuit-based programming rather than rushed supersets, allowing approximately 4 to 10 minutes between strength and power exercises that load similar muscle groups.
Registration: Not registered.
Complex training is a training method that combines strength and power exercises in a single session. The goal is to improve both the ability to produce high levels of force and the ability to express that force quickly.
A common example of complex training is pairing a heavy lower-body strength exercise, such as a squat, with a high-velocity power exercise, such as a jump. An upper-body example is to pair a bench press with a medicine-ball chest pass.
Complex training pairs strength and power exercises within the same session to improve performance outcomes such as maximal strength, jump performance, sprint ability, agility, and sport-specific power. This course reviews the current evidence comparing complex training with contrast training, strength-only programs, power-only programs, daily undulating approaches, and block periodization.
Learners will explore how acute variables such as exercise order, load, volume, frequency, and rest intervals influence outcomes. The course emphasizes that complex training is most appropriate for intermediate and advanced athletes, and that strength and power exercises should be organized with enough rest to preserve performance and maximize potentiation. Rather than using strength and power supersets with little to no rest, this course recommends circuit-based routines that allow approximately 4 to 10 minutes between exercises loading the same muscle group.
Practical examples are included for both intermediate and advanced programming, including hypertrophy-load strength paired with power-stability exercises, and max-strength loading paired with plyometric exercises. The course also demonstrates how complex training can be integrated with corrective warm-ups, active rest, and post-activation potentiation strategies to improve session efficiency and support better strength and power adaptations.
By the end of this course, you will be able to:
What is complex training?
Complex training is a training method that combines strength and power exercises in the same workout. The goal is to improve both force production and the ability to express that force quickly.
In most examples, a heavier resistance exercise is paired with a faster, more explosive exercise that uses a similar movement pattern or targets the same muscle group. For example, a squat may be paired with a jump, or a bench press with a medicine ball chest pass.
What is an example of complex training?
A common lower-body example is pairing a heavy squat with a jump. For example, an athlete may perform back squats for strength, then box jumps, squat jumps, or depth jumps for power.
An upper-body example is to pair a bench press with a medicine-ball chest pass. The strength exercise develops high-force output, while the power exercise trains the athlete to produce force quickly.
Are NASM Phase 5 strength and power supersets an example of complex training, and are they ideal for power development?
NASM Phase 5 strength and power supersets are an example of the same general idea used in complex training: pairing a high-force strength exercise with a faster, more explosive exercise for a similar movement pattern. For example, a bench press may be paired with a medicine ball chest pass, or a squat may be paired with a jump.
However, performing these pairings as true supersets with little to no rest is likely not optimal for potentiating the power exercise. The heavy strength exercise may create enough fatigue to reduce speed, jump height, throwing distance, or movement quality during the explosive exercise.
For this reason, the Brookbush Institute recommends organizing complex training as circuits rather than rushed supersets. The goal is to allow approximately 4 to 10 minutes between strength and power exercises that load similar muscle groups. This approach keeps the benefits of pairing strength and power exercises while giving the athlete enough recovery to perform the power exercise with maximal intent.
What is the difference between complex training and contrast training?
The terms complex training and contrast training are often used inconsistently. In general, both methods combine heavier strength exercises with lighter, faster power exercises.
A simple way to think about the difference is that complex training is the broader category of combining strength and power exercises in the same session, while contrast training emphasizes the contrast between heavier and lighter loads. In practice, the two methods often look very similar.
Is complex training better than strength-only or power-only training?
Complex training can be very effective, but it is not automatically better than strength-only or power-only training. The best method depends on the goal.
Strength-only training may be preferred when maximal strength is the primary goal. Power-only or plyometric training may be preferred when the main goal is speed, jumping, or explosive movement. Complex training is especially useful when the goal is to improve multiple qualities simultaneously, such as strength, jump performance, sprint performance, agility, and sport-specific power.
Complex training pairs strength and power exercises within the same session to improve performance outcomes such as maximal strength, jump performance, sprint ability, agility, and sport-specific power. This course reviews the current evidence comparing complex training with contrast training, strength-only programs, power-only programs, daily undulating approaches, and block periodization.
Learners will explore how acute variables such as exercise order, load, volume, frequency, and rest intervals influence outcomes. The course emphasizes that complex training is most appropriate for intermediate and advanced athletes, and that strength and power exercises should be organized with enough rest to preserve performance and maximize potentiation. Rather than using strength and power supersets with little to no rest, this course recommends circuit-based routines that allow approximately 4 to 10 minutes between exercises loading the same muscle group.
Practical examples are included for both intermediate and advanced programming, including hypertrophy-load strength paired with power-stability exercises, and max-strength loading paired with plyometric exercises. The course also demonstrates how complex training can be integrated with corrective warm-ups, active rest, and post-activation potentiation strategies to improve session efficiency and support better strength and power adaptations.
By the end of this course, you will be able to:
What is complex training?
Complex training is a training method that combines strength and power exercises in the same workout. The goal is to improve both force production and the ability to express that force quickly.
In most examples, a heavier resistance exercise is paired with a faster, more explosive exercise that uses a similar movement pattern or targets the same muscle group. For example, a squat may be paired with a jump, or a bench press with a medicine ball chest pass.
What is an example of complex training?
A common lower-body example is pairing a heavy squat with a jump. For example, an athlete may perform back squats for strength, then box jumps, squat jumps, or depth jumps for power.
An upper-body example is to pair a bench press with a medicine-ball chest pass. The strength exercise develops high-force output, while the power exercise trains the athlete to produce force quickly.
Are NASM Phase 5 strength and power supersets an example of complex training, and are they ideal for power development?
NASM Phase 5 strength and power supersets are an example of the same general idea used in complex training: pairing a high-force strength exercise with a faster, more explosive exercise for a similar movement pattern. For example, a bench press may be paired with a medicine ball chest pass, or a squat may be paired with a jump.
However, performing these pairings as true supersets with little to no rest is likely not optimal for potentiating the power exercise. The heavy strength exercise may create enough fatigue to reduce speed, jump height, throwing distance, or movement quality during the explosive exercise.
For this reason, the Brookbush Institute recommends organizing complex training as circuits rather than rushed supersets. The goal is to allow approximately 4 to 10 minutes between strength and power exercises that load similar muscle groups. This approach keeps the benefits of pairing strength and power exercises while giving the athlete enough recovery to perform the power exercise with maximal intent.
What is the difference between complex training and contrast training?
The terms complex training and contrast training are often used inconsistently. In general, both methods combine heavier strength exercises with lighter, faster power exercises.
A simple way to think about the difference is that complex training is the broader category of combining strength and power exercises in the same session, while contrast training emphasizes the contrast between heavier and lighter loads. In practice, the two methods often look very similar.
Is complex training better than strength-only or power-only training?
Complex training can be very effective, but it is not automatically better than strength-only or power-only training. The best method depends on the goal.
Strength-only training may be preferred when maximal strength is the primary goal. Power-only or plyometric training may be preferred when the main goal is speed, jumping, or explosive movement. Complex training is especially useful when the goal is to improve multiple qualities simultaneously, such as strength, jump performance, sprint performance, agility, and sport-specific power.
Single Session Comparisons
© 2026 Brookbush Institute. All rights reserved.