

Updated
This course presents the first comprehensively evidence-based resistance training model for endurance, hypertrophy, strength, and power. The goal for developing this model was an unprecedented level of accuracy and effectiveness. This course consolidates the Brookbush Institute’s systematic reviews of every modifiable acute variable and the four goal-specific models derived from them into a single practical resistance training model.
Test Critical Content
Coach Recommended Content
Mark As Complete
Background: Resistance-training recommendations are often derived from expert opinion, mechanistic hypotheses, traditional coaching models, older textbooks, or selected portions of the available research. Although these sources may offer useful insights, they may not provide the most accurate or effective recommendations for every modifiable programming variable. The Evidence-based Resistance Training Model was developed to address this limitation by integrating comprehensive reviews of peer-reviewed and published research on the acute variables that significantly influence resistance-training outcomes. To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensively evidence-based, outcome-driven resistance-training model designed to maximize accuracy and practical effectiveness across endurance, hypertrophy, strength, and power goals.
Objective: To develop a practical resistance-training model with the highest possible probability of accuracy, based on the current body of comparative research, by synthesizing substantially more peer-reviewed research on modifiable acute variables than previous resistance-training models and organizing the resulting recommendations into a usable framework for program design.
Methods: This model was developed from comprehensive reviews of peer-reviewed comparative research on modifiable acute variables, including load, repetition range, repetition tempo, proximity to failure, rest between sets, circuit training, sets per muscle group, training frequency, set strategies, periodization, range of motion, exercise order, and exercise selection. Conclusions from acute-variable reviews were organized into goal-specific models and then compared across endurance, hypertrophy, strength, and power outcomes.
Results: The model suggests that novice exercisers should follow similar programming recommendations during the first 6 to 12 weeks of training, regardless of long-term goal, except for an early introduction to high-velocity exercise for power goals. For experienced exercisers, many acute-variable recommendations are shared across endurance, hypertrophy, strength, and power programs, including rest intervals, circuit structure, range of motion, concentric intent, exercise order, sets per muscle group, training frequency, training splits, and aspects of periodization and exercise selection. Goal-dependent variables include the primary variable progressed, load, proximity to failure, tempo, advanced set strategies, and specific exercise-selection priorities.
Conclusions: The Evidence-based Resistance Training Model provides a practical framework for designing resistance-training programs for endurance, hypertrophy, strength, and power goals. The model was developed from a logical framework intended to produce the most accurate recommendations possible from the current body of peer-reviewed comparative research: identify the modifiable variables that influence outcomes, review all available research comparing those variables, organize the findings by goal and population, and reduce the resulting conclusions into recommendations that can be applied during program design. By converting comprehensive systematic reviews into a usable model, the EBRTM is intended to improve the accuracy and effectiveness of resistance-training decisions for clients, patients, and athletes.
This course presents the first comprehensively evidence-based resistance training model for endurance, hypertrophy, strength, and power. The goal for developing this model was an unprecedented level of accuracy and effectiveness. This course consolidates the Brookbush Institute’s systematic reviews of every modifiable acute variable and the four goal-specific models derived from them into a single practical resistance training model.
Rather than relying on expert opinion, mechanistic hypotheses, traditional coaching models, older textbooks, or trending beliefs, this course integrates findings from approximately 1,500 peer-reviewed studies, with a focus on comparative research, to determine the best evidence-based recommendation for each acute variable and each goal. The central finding is that endurance, hypertrophy, strength, and power share the vast majority of their programming and differ only in a handful of goal-dependent variables, and surprisingly, those variables do not perfectly align with previously published acute variable tables and models.
Throughout the course, the emphasis is on outcomes over mechanisms. Mechanistic hypotheses can be useful for generating ideas, but when research directly compares practical programming decisions, those outcomes should determine the recommendation. This includes decisions related to load, repetition range, tempo, proximity to failure, rest intervals, circuit training, sets per muscle group, training frequency, set strategies, periodization, range of motion, exercise order, and exercise selection.
The model is organized into three parts. The first section covers acute variables for novice exercisers during the first 6 to 12 weeks of training, when the evidence suggests programming should remain largely the same regardless of long-term goal. The second section covers Shared Variables, the recommendations that remain largely the same across endurance, hypertrophy, strength, and power. The third section covers Goal-Dependent Variables, the small set of variables that differentiate the four goals, including the primary variable progressed, load emphasis, proximity to failure, tempo, exercise selection, and advanced set strategies. The course concludes with a brief review of the optimal corrective warm-up, including how movement preparation, mobility, activation, core exercise, and integration strategies fit into the model.
The manifold increase in evidence used to develop this model resulted in recommendations with a significantly higher probability of accuracy and effectiveness; however, a practical model is still needed to make those recommendations easy to scan, reference, and apply. This course reduces the conclusions from the Brookbush Institute’s systematic reviews into a single model demonstrating that most acute variable recommendations are shared across goals, and only a small number of key variables need to be modified for endurance, hypertrophy, strength, or power. This makes programming decisions faster, clearer, and easier to apply. For professionals who want to refine their programming further, the goal-specific model courses demonstrate where details can be dialed in and where flexibility is available. For expert-level decision-making, the acute-variable courses explain how each recommendation was developed and how to fine-tune programs for specific clients, patients, athletes, and situations. In short, this model makes the rules easy to apply, the goal-specific models make the details easier to adjust, and the acute-variable courses provide the depth needed for expert-level precision.
How does the Evidence-based Resistance Training Model compare to the NASM OPT Model, ACSM’s Progression Models in Resistance Training for Healthy Adults, and the NSCA Acute Variables Table?
The NASM OPT Model, ACSM’s resistance training position stand, and the NSCA acute variables table are useful resources for organizing resistance training programs. However, the Evidence-based Resistance Training Model (EBRTM) was not developed merely to be different. It was developed to improve the probability of accuracy and effectiveness, and there are objective reasons to believe it accomplishes that goal.
The EBRTM was developed from the Brookbush Institute’s systematic reviews of every modifiable acute variable that significantly influences resistance training outcomes. These reviews integrated findings from approximately 1,500 peer-reviewed studies, with a focus on comparative research. This represents many times more relevant research than previous resistance training models, position stands, and acute variable tables.
This matters because a larger and more complete evidence base increases the probability that recommendations are accurate, well-calibrated, and robust. A partial review may still produce some correct recommendations, but it may also miss studies, variables, or relationships that would change a conclusion. A comprehensive review is more likely to identify the best available recommendation for each variable, reveal which variables matter most, and clarify when recommendations should differ by goal, population, or outcome.
The EBRTM was also developed using a systematic process. Each acute variable was reviewed, studies were sorted into comparable categories, effect directions were extracted, and recommendations were developed from the trends that emerged from the systematic reviews. Mechanistic hypotheses were not ignored, but when research directly compared practical programming decisions, outcome data determined the recommendation.
This process resulted in conclusions that differ from previously published models and acute variable tables. One of the central findings is that endurance, hypertrophy, strength, and power share the vast majority of their programming, and differ only in a handful of goal-dependent variables. These include the primary variable progressed, load emphasis, proximity to failure, tempo, exercise selection, and advanced set strategies.
In short, the NASM OPT Model, ACSM position stand, and NSCA acute variables table are helpful references, but the EBRTM was developed from a larger, more comprehensive, and more systematic review of the available research. The result is a practical model with a higher probability of accuracy and effectiveness, while also making programming decisions easier to scan, reference, apply, and refine.
What is a resistance training model?
A resistance training model is an organized framework for building exercise programs. It helps professionals decide how to manipulate acute variables such as load, repetitions, tempo, rest intervals, sets, training frequency, exercise order, range of motion, proximity to failure, and exercise selection.
A good model should make programming decisions easier, faster, and more accurate. Rather than treating every program as a blank slate, a model gives professionals a practical set of rules that can be applied, adjusted, and refined for specific goals and individuals.
What is the Evidence-based Resistance Training Model (EBRTM)?
The Evidence-based Resistance Training Model (EBRTM) is the Brookbush Institute’s comprehensive framework for designing resistance training programs for endurance, hypertrophy, strength, and power.
This model consolidates the Brookbush Institute’s systematic reviews of every modifiable acute variable, and the four goal-specific models derived from them, into a single practical programming model. The goal of the model is to reduce the most accurate and effective recommendations (based on all available evidence) into a model that is easy to scan, reference, and apply.
Is there one best resistance training program?
Yes and No. There is no single best resistance training program for every person and every goal. However, there is likely a best recommendation for each modifiable acute variable to maximize the expected value of a program; that is, most reliably result in the best possible outcome.
The EBRTM is not one magic program. It is a framework for making better programming decisions built from manitimes the relevant research used to develop previous models, acute variables tables, and programs. The intent is to recommend the acute variable ranges with the highest probability of success for each of the 4 resistance training goals (endurance, hypetrophy, strength, and power).
Can the EBRTM be used for clients, patients, and athletes?
Yes. The EBRTM was designed as a practical resistance training framework for professionals working with clients, patients, and athletes. The model provides a clear starting point, identifies which recommendations are shared across goals, and clarifies which variables should be modified for endurance, hypertrophy, strength, or power.
The model also works with clinical and performance decision-making because it can be adjusted based on pain, injury history, movement assessment findings, sports demands, recovery status, and training experience.

© 2026 Brookbush Institute. All rights reserved.